Friday, December 27, 2019

Is Flag Burning Protected By The First Amendment

The Debate Continues: Is Flag Burning Protected by the First Amendment? Adriana Ramirez First Amendment Dr. Helen Boutrous December 8, 2016 Mount Saint Mary’s University The First Amendment says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This freedom of speech clause as included in the First Amendment guarantees the citizens of America to express information and ideas freely. But is all form of speech free? On the most basic level, this clause allows for the expression of an opinion or idea without the fear of censorship by the government. It protects all forms of communication, with limits so you cannot always say anything you want, wherever you want, or whenever you want. Fighting words are not protected under the First Amendment, for instance, as are obscene expressions. Symbolic speech can be expressed in many different kinds of forms. The speech can be spoken, written, or be an action. All of these kinds of conduct could be said to express ideas in some ways, however, only some conduct is protected as symbolic speech. When the court analyzes these types of cases, they will ask the speaker about whether they intended on conveying a particular message and whether it was likely that the audience understood the message and theShow MoreRelatedSpeech Free Speech On The Freedom Of Speech1380 Words   |  6 PagesThe First Amendment says: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. This freedom of speech clause as included in the First Amendment guarantees the citizens of America to express information and ideas freely. But is all f orm of speech free? On the most basic level, this clauseRead MoreFlag Desecration Synthesis Essay1321 Words   |  6 Pages E5X-09  Ã‚   That Flag Should Not Be Protected The United States is known for being ‘land of the free’, a nation with a Declaration of Independence, as well, as a Constitution protecting the rights of it’s citizens. Wars have been fought and many people have died so we could have the rights that present today. The freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and most importantly the right to petition our government; all of which fall under the First Amendment in the Bill of RightsRead MoreThe Flag Of The United States903 Words   |  4 PagesThe flag of the United States is our national symbol and our most important symbol of all; it symbolizes our nation’s strength and pride. Due to its high values and symbolism, by  1932, forty-eight states had adopted the flag desecration laws to legally protect and restrict desecration of the flag of the United States. However, these  flag desecration laws only lasted until 1989, because  in 1989, in the Texas v Johnson case,  the Unit ed States Supreme Court recognized that flag desecration as a formRead More The Flag-burning Debate Continues Essay examples1186 Words   |  5 PagesThe Flag-burning Debate Continues      Ã‚   Nazis captured Jim Rogers. He was routinely beaten and given barely enough food to survive. During the time he spent in a World War II prisoner of war camp, he managed to keep his sanity by scraping together bits and pieces of colored cloth in order to make an American flag. As his fellow prisoners began to die, it was his American flag which provided him with a sense of identity and gave him the inspiration to keep living.    It is no wonder, thenRead MoreA Landmark Supreme Court Case856 Words   |  4 PagesPresident that he burned an American flag in protest. By doing this, a statute in Texas was violated. This statute prevented the desecration of an American flag if it could possibly anger other people amongst the protest. Johnson was arrested and charged with this violation. He was later tried in court and convicted, but he made an appeal stating that by burning the flag he was expressing his rights of â€Å"symbolic speech† which are protected by the first amendment (uscourts.gov). The definition ofRead MoreA Political Demonstration Of The Dallas City Hall1118 Words   |  5 Pageswith burning an American flag in protest against the policies, where Reagan sought to stimulate the economy with large tax cuts. Johnson was tried and convicted, under Texas law, of the desecration of a venerated object. The State Court of Appeals affirmed the actions, until the case advanced to the Sup reme Court after the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction, holding that the State (consistent with the First Amendment) could not punish Johnson for burning the flag in theseRead MoreFlag and Cross Burning as Free Speech Issues Essay1102 Words   |  5 PagesThe first ten amendments to the Constitution better known as The Bill of Rights were developed by the Founding Fathers in order to protect specific rights of the people of that time. The First Amendment protected speech, religion and expression. The First Amendment was most probably protecting scientific discourse, music, literature and the arts of elite white males. In 1791, there was no protection implied or otherwise for women or black slaves. The cross burning of the Ku Klux Klan or flag burningRead MoreShould There Be A Constitutional Amendment Prohibiting Flag Burning?1637 Words   |  7 Pagesconstitutional amendment prohibiting flag burning? 1) Describe the issue. Who, what, when, where, why, etc. Some people believe that burning the flag is extremely unpatriotic and disrespectful, while others believe it is an expression of free speech, which is protected under the First Amendment in the United States constitution. In 2006, a flag burning amendment was formally proposed in congress and failed to pass by just one vote. The closeness of this vote is a clear indication that flag burning is aRead MoreEssay on Case Analysis Texas V. Johnson1292 Words   |  6 Pages1989 --- Decided: June 21, 1989 This case analysis of Texas v. Gregory Lee Johnson was a Supreme Court case that overthrew bans on damaging the American flag in 48 of the 50 states. Gregory Lee Johnson participated in a political demonstration during the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas, where he burned the American flag. Consequently, Johnson was charged with violating the Texas law that bans vandalizing valued objects. However, Johnson appealed his conviction, and his caseRead MoreFlag Burning Essays1065 Words   |  5 PagesFlag Burning Flag Burning can be and usually is a very controversial issue. Many people are offended by the thought of destroying this countrys symbol of liberty and freedom. During a political protest during the 1984 Republican Convention, Gregory Lee Johnson was arrested for burning an American flag. Years later in 1989, Johnson got the decision overturned by the United States Supreme Court. In the same year, the state of Texas passed the Flag Protection Act, which prohibited any form

Thursday, December 19, 2019

Analysis Of George Orwell s The Animal Of Power

The craving of power is analogical to the characteristics shown by greed, furthermore explaining the interest a tyrant evokes in money and dominance. George Orwell conveys his interpretation of greed by utilizing the aim and the purpose of a fable. A fable teaches a moral lesson to the world and usually uses characters that speak and behave like humans. Early in George Orwell’s novella, an example of greed is provided when the pigs steal the apples and milk for themselves under the false simulation of it being for the merit of the farm â€Å"to preserve our [pigs] health† (Orwell 52). Squealer decieted the farm animals through the use of propaganda, which is manipulation and control of language, by portraying the pigs as saviors. Squealer s†¦show more content†¦Comparably, before Mr. Jones was deforced out of Manor Farm, he was a leech feeding off of the majority of animals, who were diligent workers. Basically, the idea expressed is that wealth and integrity c annot coexist (Kathleen Elkins 2). Money is not valued enough to buy manners, morals, respect, character, trust, class, and love (Frank Sonnenberg 2). Moreover, Napoleon resists to divide up his portion of sugar that was placed on his table with the other pigs, due to making â€Å"them fat† (Orwell 116). Similarly, in the human nature, beings formulate various forms of excuses to fit their desires, ensuring that priority reflects their own self first before others, a key factor to signify selfishishness. The irony pointed out is that Napoleon declares sugar to be the cause for the pigs’ gain in body weight, despite the fact that he is considered as part of their species. Corrupt and avaricious pigs care less about the animals, availing the privileges of acquiring power. The pigs inherit Mr. Jones’s garments and morals throughout Animal Farm to demonstrate how Mr. Jones’s power permits to influence the pigs, who were previously against his regulations. After a long period of observing the conditions of the farm and its creatures, the pigs commenced to grow tedious from their customs and ordinary routines, yearning to experience a man’s livelihood. Napoleon is deceived by Mr.Show MoreRelatedHow Is Marxism Portrayed in Animal Farm by George Orwell? Essay1369 Words   |  6 PagesHow is Marxism portrayed throughout ‘Animal Farm’ by George Orwell? The main aim of Marxism is to bring about a classless society, and ‘Animal Farm’ is generally considered to be a Marxist novel, as all its characters share a similar ambition at the beginning. ‘Animal Farm’ represents an example of the oppressed masses rising up to form their own classless society, whilst offering a subtle critique on Stalin’s Soviet Russia, and communism in general. Orwell is, ironically, revolutionary in hisRead MoreGeorge Orwell s Animal Farm1403 Words   |  6 PagesGeorge Orwell believes â€Å"What you get over and over again is a movement of the proletariat which is promptly characterized and betrayed by astute people at the top and then the growth of a new governing class. The one thing that never arrives is equality† (Letemendia 1). Orwell simply loathes revolution and thinks it is unfair to the majority, for the people. He thinks that while individuals change, the people in power are always corrupt and they will corru pt any attempt at change. He communicatesRead MoreIn the autumn of 1836, George Orwell, a British author, novelist, essayist, and critic wrote an1000 Words   |  4 PagesIn the autumn of 1836, George Orwell, a British author, novelist, essayist, and critic wrote an essay called Shooting an Elephant. In the essay, he describes his experiences as a white British imperial police officer in Burma. The story takes place in British-ruled Burma. This essay portrays Orwell’s discomfort about Imperialism. In shooting an Elephant, Orwell uses different literary techniques to portray the Imperialism collapsing. In this essay Orwell describes his experience of being pressuredRead MoreLiterary Analysis Of Animal Farm By George Orwell1310 Words   |  6 PagesLiterary Analysis of Animal Farm Although they claimed the farm to be a utopia, the pigs secretly were deceiving their fellow animals and turning the farm into a dystopia. In George Orwell s Animal Farm all of the animals are mistreated by Farmer Jones, but they wish to be treated as equals and live in a utopia so they rebel and take over the farm. The animals first write commandments to avoid chaos, but the leader pigs selfishly modify the commandments in their favor. In the end, the farm isRead MoreLiterary Analysis Of Animal Farm By George Orwell1405 Words   |  6 PagesLiterary analysis of Animal Farm The rebellion was to escape from people and their cruel ways, but can they escape the death-grip of their own kind? The animals of animal farms are mistreated and have no rights. Mr and Mrs. Jones were the owners of Manor Farm, the human oppressors, and authoritarians of the animals. The animals rebel against the Jones and take over the farm. They create a utopian society for themselves, but the utopia quickly turns into a dystopia when the pigs take control ofRead More Animal Farm as a Political Satire to Criticise Totalitarian Regimes4636 Words   |  19 PagesAnimal Farm as a Political Satire to Criticise Totalitarian Regimes This study aims to determine that George Orwells Animal Farm is a political satire which was written to criticise totalitarian regimes and particularly Stalins practices in Russia. In order to provide background information that would reveal causes led Orwell to write Animal Farm, Chapter one is devoted to a brief summary of the progress of authors life and significant events that had impact on his political convictions. ChapterRead MoreGeorge Orwells Animal Farm Essay examples2468 Words   |  10 PagesA: A satire to some, but a slanderous novella to us: George Orwell’s Animal Farm uses a plethora of satirical techniques to mock our glorious authoritarian regimes. Throughout the sequence of events, the animals live under ridiculous commandments, such as not wearing clothing or sleeping on beds. They are each rightfully voided until one modified version remains: â€Å"ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL / BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS† (Orwell, Animal 133). The trimmin gs of freedom, although a stellarRead MoreThe Storu- Animal Farm2755 Words   |  11 PagesThe story of Animal Farm is a political allegory of the situation of the communist Soviet Union. The author of the story George Orwell attempts to describe the events of the communist Russia and the bloody Revolutions through the characters of the Animal Farm. The novel introduces the story of a an animal farm which is being used to destroy the living of the animals by competing for the power in the governance of the farm which leaves the farm shattered in the end. It also depicts that how democraciesRead MoreThe Giver ( Lois Lowry ), And Animal Farm1805 Words   |  8 Pagesemotions, and you are executed if you break the rules three times. Now imagine that you are an embattered animal living on a farm where your owner, Mr. Jones, barely feeds you, and is often drunk, leaving you in horrible conditions. An old pig that everyone respects makes a grand speech of his dream of equality and the animals freeing themselves from the oppression of Mr. Jones. You and the animals rebel, only to have a brutal dictator usurp the rightful leader, and execute anyone who agrees with hisRead MorePsychoanalysis And Marxism And 19842034 Words   |  9 Pages Psychoanalysis, Marxism, and 1984 Applying modern theoretical lenses to historic works can lead to an alternate understanding of a text - perhaps one the author did not intend. Novels, like George Orwell’s 1984, can be analyzed through multiple lenses. The strongest analysis, however, can be conducted through the lenses of Marxism and psychoanalysis. Through these complementary lenses, readers gain an understanding of social constructs (Marxism) and the effects of these constructs on human behavior

Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Separation Or Termination And Procedures †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Separation Or Termination Policies And Procedures? Answer: Introducation Following the rising separation disputes, it is imperative for the company to formalise separation or termination policies and procedures. It will be able to improve the outcome of the employee. For instance, when the company introduced digital surveillance system by CCTV installed Cameras, redundancy occurred as three security officers lost their job while two of them were redeployed to other jobs in the operations. Redeployment plan should take relevant procedure of communicating about it two months prior to implementation. It will assist in change adaptability and psychological preparedness and it is a legal requirement when employees services have to be withdrawn. According to the legal policies, the organization can be giving compensation fee for the separation or termination of policies. One of the policies can be on redundancy pay (Ashman, 2016, p.149). The proposal seeks for such compensation unless a person refuses the offer without any genuine reason. The personnel who will be given the position to implement these policies should be examined by the HR department. He should possess confidentiality of the employee issues and follow the legal procedures in executing redeployment, redundancy in the organization. (Oleszek, 2014, p.37). skills in sound judgement, equality and fairness are required. Knowledge to conduct the procedurals professionally, and as per the labour rights of the government of Australia should be a requirement. As implementation will be carried on some two months after communication and publication in accounting organization manual, the leaders are supposed to hold confidentiality of their employees. It would be lack of ethics if the employees and the organization details and secrets leaks to everybody. The HR department can be in a position to use some metrics to gather and analyse workforce data. The employee performance and areas of improvement as well as probability of employee turnover or redundancy due to a change in the trends (Demarzo and Sannikov, 2016, p.182). HR Dashboard and other HR software such as Workday, Jobvite or Officevibe can be used. On the other hand, the organization can be in a position to conduct an exit interview so that the employee who is leaving the organization can help the management to know what may be the cause for future improvement. The legislation process of the state of Australia will be guiding any act that contravenes the law and order of the separation and termination policies (Chen, 2014, p.106). The proposals and procedures can change the organization for better if well appreciated and implemented. References Ashman, I., 2016. Downsizing: Managing Redundancy and Restructuring. In Reframing Resolution (pp. 149-167). Palgrave Macmillan Management. Chen, L.C., 2014. An introduction to contemporary international law: a policy-oriented perspective. Oxford University Press. Demarzo, P.M. and Sannikov, Y., 2016. Learning, termination, and payout policy in dynamic incentive contracts. The Review of Economic Studies, 84(1), pp.182-236. Oleszek, W.J., 2014. Congressional procedures and the policy Business process. Sage.

Tuesday, December 3, 2019

The Holocaust Essays - Antisemitism, The Holocaust, Racism

The Holocaust Historically, the word holocaust meant a religious rite in which an offering was completely consumed by fire. In current times the word holocaust has changed to a darker more tragic meaning and refers to more than a religious sacrifice. During World War II, a fire raged throughout Eastern Europe. Guns, bombs, and military groups did not ignite this fire. This fire burned intensely in the hearts of men -- sparked by centuries-old prejudice. One man, Adolf Hitler, took this flicker of hatred and fanned the flames. Hitler energized and stoked the embers, spreading them throughout Eastern Europe causing widespread destruction in the pursuit of a perfect Aryan nation. Although the Holocaust is measured over the course of twelve long years, it does not begin with the mass murder of innocent victims. Michael Berenbaum, a survivor of the Holocaust believes, Age-old prejudice led to discrimination, discrimination to incarceration, incarceration to elimination (Altman 1). Thus, the progression of prejudice in the Holocaust began as a flicker of hatred in the heart of a leader and became a blazing inferno consuming the lives of the men, women, and children who crossed its radical path. After World War I, the social climate in Germany was depressing. The German people were humiliated by their country's defeat and by the terms of the Treaty of Versailles. The financial depression that resulted left millions of individuals out of work. The German government was weak, and the people sought new leadership. These conditions provided an opportune setting for a new leader, Adolf Hitler, and his party, the National Socialist German Workers Party. Hitler, reckless and powerful, was able to fan the flames of an ancient hatred into a wild and out of control holocaust (Altman 12). As with most hatred and prejudices, the hatred that fueled the Holocaust started with verbal abuse. As soon as Hitler was named chancellor, he persuaded the cabinet to declare a state of emergency allowing him to end all personal freedom. Among the rights lost were freedom of press, freedom of speech, and freedom of gathering. He then voiced his beliefs in the supreme Aryan race. As his beliefs spread, spoken or verbal abuse escalated. Those who were not considered to be of the perfect Aryan race were jeered and mocked. Fred Margulies, a survivor of the Holocaust, recalls: When I was about ten years old there was a knock on my apartment-house door: and there was my best friend, Hans. And he spat in my face, and he said 'Manfred, you dirtyJew' my best friend changed overnight (Shulman 7). The Jews endured burning words tossed at them consistently. At first, they were told Jews were not desired, and finally, they were told Jews were prohibited. Jews were not the only ones attacked. Jehovah Witnesses, handicapped individuals, and foreigners were also considered racially and genetically poor. These verbal attacks became the match that would ignite a much bigger fire. Verbal attacks sparked an avoidance of those considered undesirable. On April 1, 1933, Hitler called for a boycott of all Jewish businesses. Nazi storm troopers stood in front of stores owned by Jewish proprietors holding signs that warned: Don't buy from Jews, The Jews are our misfortune, and Buy Aryan (Bachrach 14). Many Jews lost their businesses as a result of the boycott. Restaurant signs cautioned, No Jews or Dogs Allowed(15). Radio broadcasts and newspapers became Nazi advertisement tools to spread lies about the Jew. Schools taught that the Aryans were the most intelligent race. Pictures were displayed showing the sizes of different brains and always depicted the Aryan brain as the largest. Furthermore, the people were told it was a sin against the German people, their ancestors, and the Aryans' future to associate with the Jews. The Nazi Party distributed leaflets urging pure Germans to keep their distance from the Jews and to shun the Star of David with great ridicule (Shulman 35). The large-scale avoidance of the immoral Germans made German society more receptive to legalized discrimination. The government was quick to pass laws that in essence torched Jewish citizenship and their legal standing within society. The Nuremberg Laws prevented immoral Germans from being citizens, owning property, or marrying pure Germans. These laws were further